Don´t you speak spanish? Try here

viernes, 20 de agosto de 2021

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko comparece ante Corte Rabínica de Jerusalén. El vídeo más brutal sobre la realidad de la vacuna que he visto.


El Dr. Zelenko conocido por el Protocolo Zelenko para tratamiento del COVID-19 comparece en modalidad virtual ante la Corte Rabínica de Jerusalén el 5 de Agosto del 2021. Completo, con subtítulos en Español.

miércoles, 11 de agosto de 2021

Humanos transgénicos con ADN patentado.

Can genes be patented


A gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific sequence of DNA (a gene) given by a government to the individual, organization, or corporation who claims to have first identified the gene. Once granted a gene patent, the holder of the patent dictates how the gene can be used, in both commercial settings, such as clinical genetic testing, and in noncommercial settings, including research, for 20 years from the date of the patent. Gene patents have often resulted in companies having sole ownership of genetic testing for patented genes.

On June 13, 2013, in the case of the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that human genes cannot be patented in the U.S. because DNA is a "product of nature." The Court decided that because nothing new is created when discovering a gene, there is no intellectual property to protect, so patents cannot be granted. Prior to this ruling, more than 4,300 human genes were patented. The Supreme Court's decision invalidated those gene patents, making the genes accessible for research and for commercial genetic testing.

The Supreme Court's ruling did allow that DNA manipulated in a lab is eligible to be patented because DNA sequences altered by humans are not found in nature. The Court specifically mentioned the ability to patent a type of DNA known as complementary DNA (cDNA). This synthetic DNA is produced from the molecule that serves as the instructions for making proteins (called messenger RNA).

Fuente:

U.S. National Medicine Library


Según esto, el 13 de Junio de 2013 se acordó en la corte suprema de USA que el ADN natural del hombre no puede ser patentado, al vernir de la naturaleza. Pero si es modificado entonces es patentable.

Sabiendo que el ARN se transcribe al ADN, implica que el ADN de las personas vacunadas puede ser patentado por la empresa que lo modificó, dejando de ser un humano natural para convertirse en un "producto". Los productos no tienen derechos humanos.